Quality Control Dashboard
First-pass yield dropped 3% last shift. You see it now, not next week. Fix it before it compounds.
Solution Overview
First-pass yield dropped 3% last shift. You see it now, not next week. Fix it before it compounds. This solution is part of our Productivity domain and can be deployed in 2-4 weeks using our proven tech stack.
Industries
This solution is particularly suited for:
The Need
Manufacturing and pharmaceutical operations face a critical visibility problem: quality metrics arrive hours, days, or weeks after production completes. A production run finishes on the night shift, but defect rate analysis doesn't happen until the next morning when the quality manager reviews batch reports. By then, dozens of defective units may have already passed through packaging and entered the shipping queue. For facilities running continuous production with multiple shifts, this time lag is devastating. A pharmaceutical manufacturer discovers through end-of-batch testing that a critical parameter drifted out of specification during hour 4 of an 8-hour production run—but the drift went undetected for hours because data was only reviewed at shift end. An automotive parts supplier realizes their scrap rate has been trending upward for two weeks, but the trend wasn't visible until the monthly quality meeting, by which time hundreds of defective parts had been produced.
The root causes are multiple but interconnected. Quality inspection data is scattered across different systems: dimensional measurements in CMM software, visual inspection records in spreadsheets, test results in laboratory information systems (LIMS), scrap reports in the ERP, and first-pass yield calculations done manually by quality engineers. No unified dashboard aggregates this data in real-time. When data does arrive, it's reactive—numbers reported after production completes—rather than predictive. Statistical Process Control (SPC) charting, the fundamental tool for detecting process drift before producing defects, requires manual data entry and chart updates. Control limit alerts are often missed because no one monitors charts continuously. Even when trends are detected, root cause investigation is slow: quality engineers must manually correlate defects with production line, shift, operator, equipment setting, material lot, and environmental conditions.
The financial consequences are severe and measurable. Scrap costs for manufactured goods run 2-5% of production cost for well-controlled processes, but spike to 10-20% when quality drift goes undetected. A manufacturer producing 10,000 units daily with $50 cost per unit experiences $5,000-10,000 daily scrap at baseline, escalating to $50,000-100,000 daily during quality drift. First-pass yield (percentage of units meeting specification on first production attempt) drops from 95%+ in controlled processes to 80-90% during drift, multiplying rework costs. Customers discover defects during their own quality checks, triggering returns, warranty claims, and reputational damage. In pharmaceutical manufacturing, quality drift that produces out-of-specification batches can trigger FDA warnings, product recalls, and production shutdowns costing millions. Beyond direct costs, poor quality drains resources: production line stops for investigation, personnel diverted to rework and disposition, expedited testing to clear hold statuses, and emergency actions to prevent customer shipments of defective goods.
The underlying challenge is that modern manufacturing produces data far faster than humans can process it. A single automated inspection station generates hundreds of measurements per minute. Environmental monitoring systems (temperature, humidity, pressure) log values every few seconds. Equipment sensors track vibration, cycle time, temperature, and dozens of other parameters. This flood of data contains early warning signals of quality drift, but extracting those signals requires real-time analytics, not end-of-shift reports. Quality control has traditionally relied on human sampling and inspection—checking a percentage of units and extrapolating to the whole batch. This sampling-based approach was necessary when inspection was manual, but it's obsolete when automated inspection can measure every unit in real-time.
The Idea
A Quality Control Dashboard transforms manufacturing quality from reactive firefighting into proactive drift prevention by providing real-time visualization of quality metrics, automated Statistical Process Control (SPC) charting, intelligent control limit alerts, and systematic root cause correlation. The system ingests quality data from all sources—CMM machines, inspection systems, LIMS labs, production equipment, and manual inspection forms—and centralizes it on unified dashboards accessible to quality engineers, production supervisors, and line operators.
The core feature is real-time KPI visualization. Key performance indicators for quality—defect rate by type, first-pass yield (FPY), scrap cost, rework volume, customer returns—are displayed on large monitors at production stations and updated every 1-5 minutes. When FPY drops below threshold (e.g., below 95%), the dashboard highlights it in red and alerts the line supervisor automatically. When defect rate of a specific defect code (e.g., "dimensional out-of-spec") exceeds historical average, the system flags it for investigation. Operators and supervisors see immediate feedback on quality performance, creating accountability and enabling rapid response.
Statistical Process Control (SPC) charting is automated and continuous. For every measurable quality parameter (dimension, surface finish, electrical property, visual inspection score), the system maintains an SPC chart: X-bar and R charts for individual measurements, p-charts for pass/fail percentages, c-charts for defect counts. The system automatically calculates control limits (typically mean ± 3 standard deviations) and plots each new measurement on the chart. When a point plots outside control limits—indicating the process has shifted and is now producing out-of-specification material—the system immediately alerts the quality engineer and production supervisor with a notification: "Dimension XYZ exceeded upper control limit at 14:47. Last 5 measurements show upward trend. Suggest process adjustment or material lot investigation."
Beyond simple control limit alerts, the system implements trend detection using run rules: if the last 7 measurements are all above the centerline (indicating upward drift even though still in control), or if 2 of 3 consecutive points are very close to the upper control limit (indicating process centering is shifting), the system alerts before any out-of-control point occurs. This predictive alert gives operators time to adjust the process before defects are produced. For continuous production processes, the system tracks individual measurement trends: a bearing temperature rising by 2°C/hour will reach failure threshold in 24 hours, so the system alerts predictively rather than waiting for temperature to exceed limit.
Trend analysis dashboards show quality metrics over time periods relevant to production: last hour, last shift, last day, last week, last month. These trends are disaggregated by relevant dimensions: defect rate by production line, by shift, by operator, by material lot, by machine setting, by customer. When defect rate spikes, a quality engineer can instantly see which production line, shift, or operator was responsible. When a specific defect code increases, the system correlates it with production parameters: "Defect type 'surface scratches' increased 15% on Line 3 starting 11-20. Correlation with material lot: Part-Supplier-B-Lot-2847 (received 11-20). Recommend material verification."
Quality alerts are intelligent and actionable. Rather than generating dozens of alerts per shift (which operators ignore), the system implements alert routing and suppression. Critical alerts—out-of-control SPC points, scrap spike, first-pass yield collapse—trigger immediate notifications to quality engineer and line supervisor via email, SMS, and on-screen alerts. Warnings—close-to-limit measurements, early trend detection—are logged to dashboards and reviewed during shift meetings. Alerts include context: "Alert: FPY dropped to 92.3% at 15:22 on Line 4. Last defect was 'dimensional-out-of-spec'. Similar defect pattern detected 11-15 with material lot Supplier-A-Lot-1234. Recommend material audit or equipment calibration verification."
Root cause correlation is built into the system. When a defect spike occurs, the quality dashboard automatically correlates it with all relevant production parameters recorded at that time: material lot, equipment settings, environmental conditions, operator, machine maintenance history, previous quality issues. The system can surface patterns: "Surface scratch defects correlate with night shift (90% of scratches occur 22:00-06:00). Night shift uses equipment maintenance from 18:00-20:00; recommend lubrication increase or belt tension verification."
For manufacturing with first-article inspection or customer-specific quality requirements, the system integrates inspection results with batch release decisions. Batches cannot be released to customers until quality hold statuses are cleared. The dashboard shows: "Batch PO-2024-1847: Awaiting dimensional verification (5 of 18 points measured, 2 out-of-spec). Release blocked until all measurements complete and out-of-spec items are investigated."
The system generates quality reports for management, customers, and regulators. Monthly quality dashboards show trending metrics, highlight significant events, and document actions taken. For FDA-regulated manufacturers, the system can generate automated reports of all SPC alerts, out-of-control conditions, and corrective actions taken, supporting evidence for FDA inspections. For ISO 9001 compliance, the system maintains audit trails of all quality alerts, investigations, and process changes.
How It Works
Real-Time Processing] C --> F D --> F E --> F F --> G[Store in Event Log
SQLite] G --> H[Calculate SPC Statistics
Mean, StdDev, Limits] H --> I[Plot Control Chart
X-bar R Chart] I --> J{Control
Limit
Check?} J -->|Out of Control| K[Alert: SPC Violation
Quality Engineer] J -->|Trend Warning| L[Alert: Drift Detection
Supervisor] J -->|Normal| M[Continue Monitoring] K --> N[Quality Dashboard
Real-Time Display] L --> N M --> N N --> O[Line Supervisor Views
Active Alerts] N --> P[Quality Engineer Analysis
Detailed SPC Charts] N --> Q[Plant Manager Trending
Monthly Performance] P --> R[Root Cause Analysis
Correlate Production Data] R --> S{Issue
Confirmed?} S -->|Yes| T[Corrective Action
Plan & Document] S -->|No| M T --> U[Execute Remedy
Adjust Process/Material] U --> V[Verify Resolution
Monitor SPC] O --> W[KPI Dashboards:
FPY, Defect Rate,
Scrap Cost, Yield] Q --> W V --> W W --> X[Batch Release Decision
Quality Hold Status] X --> Y[Generate Compliance
Reports for Audit]
Real-time Quality Control Dashboard with automated SPC charting, control limit alerts, trend analysis, and root cause correlation. Ingests data from CMM machines, lab systems, production equipment, and inspection forms to provide continuous process monitoring and predictive quality alerts.
The Technology
All solutions run on the IoTReady Operations Traceability Platform (OTP), designed to handle millions of data points per day with sub-second querying. The platform combines an integrated OLTP + OLAP database architecture for real-time transaction processing and powerful analytics.
Deployment options include on-premise installation, deployment on your cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP), or fully managed IoTReady-hosted solutions. All deployment models include identical enterprise features.
OTP includes built-in backup and restore, AI-powered assistance for data analysis and anomaly detection, integrated business intelligence dashboards, and spreadsheet-style data exploration. Role-based access control ensures appropriate information visibility across your organization.
Frequently Asked Questions
Deployment Model
Rapid Implementation
2-4 week implementation with our proven tech stack. Get up and running quickly with minimal disruption.
Your Infrastructure
Deploy on your servers with Docker containers. You own all your data with perpetual license - no vendor lock-in.
Related Solutions
Non-Conformance Report (NCR) System
Defect spotted. Photo snapped. Barcode scanned. NCR filed—all before the part leaves the station.
First Article Inspection (FAI) Tracker
Aerospace customer asks for AS9102 forms. You generate them in minutes—balloon drawings, dimensions, sign-offs, all digital.
Laboratory Information Management (LIMS)
Sun Pharma tracks every sample from receipt to certificate of analysis. Chain of custody, 21 CFR Part 11 compliant—no paper trail to reconstruct.
Ready to Get Started?
Let's discuss how Quality Control Dashboard can transform your operations.
Schedule a Demo