🔄

Rework Order Tracker

Part failed inspection. Rework order created. Root cause linked. Cost tracked. Re-inspection passed. All documented.

Solution Overview

Part failed inspection. Rework order created. Root cause linked. Cost tracked. Re-inspection passed. All documented. This solution is part of our Productivity domain and can be deployed in 2-4 weeks using our proven tech stack.

Industries

This solution is particularly suited for:

Manufacturing Aerospace Medical Device

The Need

Manufacturing operations across aerospace, medical devices, and precision manufacturing face a persistent challenge: not all products pass inspection on first attempt. A batch of components emerges from production with minor dimensional deviations, surface finish issues, or assembly defects. Rather than scrap the entire batch (losing material and labor investment), manufacturers rework the components—correcting the defect and re-inspecting to verify conformance. Yet rework is often treated as a shameful secret rather than a managed process, buried in production schedules without proper tracking, root cause analysis, or cost accounting. The result is that manufacturers lack visibility into rework frequency, cost, and patterns.

This visibility gap creates multiple business problems. First, rework costs spiral unchecked. A component costs $150 in raw material and $300 in labor to manufacture initially. When rework is required, it consumes additional labor (technician time, supervisor verification, re-inspection). Over a year, rework might represent 5-15% of total labor cost—a six-figure expense in a mid-size manufacturing facility—yet budget accountability for this cost is murky. Management cannot distinguish between rework caused by inadequate initial setup (fixable with training or process improvement), rework caused by supplier quality issues (correctable through supplier management), and rework caused by unrealistic product specifications (requiring engineering review). Without this granularity, cost reduction is impossible.

Second, rework obscures quality signals. If a production process generates 3% scrap and 8% rework (11% total defect rate), management sees only the scrap number and underestimates true process capability. Rework masks underlying quality problems. The same defect that causes a component to be reworked today might cause field failure in a customer's assembly tomorrow, if that component is used before re-inspection is complete or if the rework defect is missed during verification. Aerospace and medical device manufacturers face regulatory exposure under AS9100 and ISO 13485, which explicitly require traceability of all reworked components and documented evidence that rework achieved conformance to specifications.

Third, rework inventory creates supply chain confusion. A batch of 1,000 components enters production. 950 pass initial inspection and are released. 50 components are reworked. Of those 50, 47 pass re-inspection and are released days later as additional stock. The manufacturing system often doesn't distinguish between first-pass components and reworked components, leading to confusion about which components in a shipment have undergone rework. If a field failure occurs weeks later, investigators cannot determine whether the failure involved a first-pass component or a reworked component, complicating root cause analysis.

The ideal solution treats rework as a distinct, traceable production stream with documented root causes, cost tracking by rework reason, mandatory re-inspection, and trending analytics to drive process improvement.

The Idea

A Rework Order Tracker transforms rework from an untracked overhead cost into a managed, data-driven process that drives continuous improvement. When initial quality inspection identifies a defective component or assembly, instead of an informal repair, the system creates a formal rework order (RO-XXXX) that tracks the component from defect identification through rework completion and re-inspection verification.

The rework process begins with defect documentation. The quality inspector who discovered the defect records: component serial number or batch identification, defect category (dimensional, surface finish, assembly, electrical, cosmetic), specific measurements that fail specification, photographs of the defect, and initial assessment of probable cause. The system automatically assigns a rework order ID and rework priority based on defect severity and inventory availability.

For each rework order, the system captures root cause linkage. The quality manager investigates the initial production order (the original work order that created the defective component) and links the rework order to the original work order. This linkage reveals the production context: which operator performed the initial work, which setup was used, which production shift, which equipment. This context is essential for root cause analysis—if multiple rework orders link to the same original setup, the setup procedure is the problem. If they link to the same operator, training is the problem. If they link to the same supplier batch of raw material, supplier quality is the problem.

The rework order displays step-by-step instructions for correction. For a dimensional defect (e.g., hole diameter 0.505" when specification requires 0.500" +/- 0.005"), the instructions specify which operation to perform (re-drill, hand-ream to final dimension) and which equipment to use (CNC with specified program, hand-reaming tool with calibration). Technicians follow the rework procedure using the mobile app, scanning the component barcode at start and end of each rework step. Time capture during rework is automatic: system records start time, technician identity, steps performed, and completion time, creating accurate labor cost data.

Mandatory re-inspection is embedded into the workflow. Once rework is complete, the component cannot be released without re-inspection by quality. The re-inspection is not the same inspector who approved the original defective part (eliminating conflict of interest). The re-inspector verifies the component against the original specification using the same inspection criteria: measurements, visual inspection, photographs. If re-inspection passes, the component is marked as "Rework Complete—Acceptable" and can be released to inventory or shipped to the customer. If re-inspection fails (rework didn't fully correct the defect), the component escalates to engineering review: Can the component be reworked again? Should it be scrapped? Is the specification too tight for manufacturing capability?

Cost tracking by rework reason enables root cause-driven improvements. The system categorizes rework by reason: "Setup Error" (400 components this quarter), "Operator Error" (180 components), "Supplier Quality" (520 components), "Specification Too Tight" (45 components), "Equipment Drift" (310 components). Each category has associated costs: labor for rework, re-inspection time, supervision time, material consumed during rework (new raw materials, coolant, consumables). The system calculates total cost by rework reason: "Supplier Quality rework cost this quarter: $87,000. Top supplier: Vendor ABC (340 components, $58,000 cost)." This granular cost visibility drives action: negotiate with Vendor ABC for quality improvement, or change suppliers.

For serial-numbered products and those with regulatory traceability requirements, the system maintains complete genealogy of the rework history. A finished product serial number SN-2024-07-4821 has an embedded rework history: "This product was initially produced on Work Order WO-2024-0847, failed inspection for dimensional defect on 2024-07-15, was reworked on 2024-07-16 under Rework Order RO-2024-2847, passed re-inspection on 2024-07-17, and was released to customer on 2024-07-20." This traceability is essential for aerospace and medical device manufacturers required by audit standards to document all rework and verification.

Analytics dashboards show rework trends and emerging problems. Trending charts show: rework rate by production line, rework cost by cause, repeat rework (same component reworked twice), repeat defects (same defect type recurring week after week). Alerts trigger when anomalies appear: "Rework rate on Line 3 jumped from 2% to 7% this week—investigate equipment drift or operator change." This forward-looking analytics enables root cause resolution before small problems become systemic.

How It Works

flowchart TD A[Component Fails
Initial Inspection] --> B[Quality Inspector
Documents Defect] B --> C[Capture Photos &
Measurements] C --> D[System Links to
Original Work Order] D --> E[Create Rework
Order RO-XXXX] E --> F[Root Cause
Investigation] F --> G[Assign Rework
Procedure] G --> H[Technician Performs
Rework Steps] H --> I[Capture Labor Time
& Materials Used] I --> J[Rework
Complete] J --> K[Component to
Re-Inspection] K --> L{Re-Inspection
Pass?} L -->|Pass| M[Mark Rework
Accepted] L -->|Fail| N{Engineering
Decision} N -->|Rework Again| H N -->|Scrap| O[Scrap Component] M --> P[Calculate Rework
Cost by Reason] O --> P P --> Q[Update Root Cause
Metrics] Q --> R[Analytics: Identify
Improvement Targets]

Complete rework order lifecycle from defect identification through root cause linkage, guided rework execution, mandatory re-inspection verification, cost tracking by reason, and continuous improvement analytics.

The Technology

All solutions run on the IoTReady Operations Traceability Platform (OTP), designed to handle millions of data points per day with sub-second querying. The platform combines an integrated OLTP + OLAP database architecture for real-time transaction processing and powerful analytics.

Deployment options include on-premise installation, deployment on your cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP), or fully managed IoTReady-hosted solutions. All deployment models include identical enterprise features.

OTP includes built-in backup and restore, AI-powered assistance for data analysis and anomaly detection, integrated business intelligence dashboards, and spreadsheet-style data exploration. Role-based access control ensures appropriate information visibility across your organization.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does rework typically cost manufacturing companies per year?
Rework costs vary significantly by industry and manufacturing complexity, but most facilities experience rework as 5-15% of total labor cost annually. For a mid-size manufacturing facility with $2M in annual labor costs, this translates to $100,000-$300,000 in unmeasured rework expense per year. Aerospace and precision manufacturing typically face higher rework rates (8-15%) due to tight tolerances and critical quality requirements, while consumer goods manufacturing may experience lower rates (3-8%). Without proper tracking and cost accounting, these expenses remain invisible to management and continue growing unchecked. A rework order tracker quantifies these hidden costs by reason—allowing manufacturers to identify the top 3-5 causes responsible for 80% of rework spending and systematically eliminate them. Most customers implementing rework tracking report cost reductions of 20-35% within 6 months by addressing root causes like inadequate operator training, supplier quality issues, or unrealistic product specifications.
What is the best way to track rework orders in aerospace and medical device manufacturing?
Aerospace (AS9100) and medical device (ISO 13485) manufacturers must maintain complete documented traceability of all reworked components. The best approach integrates rework tracking with production work orders and creates immutable audit trails showing: the original defect, photographs of the defect, the rework procedure performed, technician credentials and sign-off, re-inspection results, and final disposition. A rework order tracker designed for regulatory compliance automatically links each rework order to the original production work order, captures labor time with technician identification, requires re-inspection by a different person than the original inspector, and generates compliance documentation with digital signatures. This approach eliminates manual record-keeping, reduces audit preparation time by 60-70%, and provides real-time evidence of conformance to regulatory standards. When a component must be traced (due to field failure investigation or audit), the system instantly retrieves the complete rework history: which inspector found the defect, what the defect was, how it was corrected, and who verified the correction. This traceability is legally binding and satisfies auditor requirements for documented evidence of rework and verification.
How do you calculate rework labor cost and prevent cost inflation?
Rework labor costs should be captured automatically through time-tracking during the rework process itself, not estimated afterward. When a technician scans a component barcode to begin rework, the system records the start time, technician identity, and labor rate. As the technician completes each rework step using the mobile app, the system captures timestamps for each operation. When rework is complete, the system calculates total labor minutes and multiplies by hourly rate to determine cost. This method eliminates guesswork and prevents cost inflation from memory-based estimates ("I think it took about 30 minutes"). Most rework labor costs break down as: 30-40% productive rework (actual repair work), 20-30% re-inspection time, 15-25% setup and material handling, and 10-15% supervision and escalation. By measuring each component separately, manufacturers can identify which rework reasons consume disproportionate labor (e.g., "Supplier Quality components average 45 minutes to rework vs. 20 minutes for Setup Error"). This granular visibility enables targeted cost reduction—focusing effort on the highest-cost root causes yields the greatest ROI on process improvements.
How does root cause analysis on rework orders help improve manufacturing processes?
Root cause analysis on rework orders works by automatically linking rework orders to the original production work order that created the defective component, then extracting production context: which operator performed the initial work, which equipment was used, which setup procedure was followed, which raw material lot was used, and which production shift produced the component. When multiple rework orders link to the same root cause element, a pattern emerges. If 8 rework orders in one month linked to Setup-C with the same defect type, the setup procedure is the problem—training or procedure revision is the solution. If rework orders cluster by operator (Technician 5 has 3x the rework rate of peers), operator training is needed. If rework correlates with specific raw material lots from Vendor ABC, supplier quality is the issue. This systematic pattern detection transforms rework from anecdotal ("That Setup-C always has problems") into quantified facts ("Setup-C produced 120 components this quarter, 8 required rework—6.7% defect rate versus 2% average"). With this data, managers prioritize improvements by ROI: "Fixing Setup-C improves 6.7% of components (120 units). Retraining Technician 5 improves 3 components. Supplier diversification from Vendor ABC improves 12 components." Root cause tracking typically identifies 3-5 high-impact improvement opportunities within 30 days of implementation.
What production information should be captured when creating a rework order?
When a quality inspector identifies a defective component and creates a rework order, the system should capture: (1) Component identification—serial number or batch ID, and for traced products, the finished product serial number; (2) Defect documentation—defect category (dimensional, surface finish, assembly, electrical, cosmetic), specific measurements or observations that fail specification, and photographs from multiple angles; (3) Original production context—the work order that initially produced the component, the operator who performed the work, the equipment used, the specific setup configuration, the production shift, the date and time of original production, and the raw material lot; (4) Probable cause hypothesis from the inspector; (5) Rework priority based on defect severity and inventory availability. This information linkage enables automatic root cause investigation: the system immediately identifies other rework orders from the same original setup, operator, equipment, or raw material lot, surfacing patterns that human analysis might miss. For aerospace and medical device manufacturers, this production context is essential for regulatory compliance—auditors must understand what conditions produced the defective component and what corrective actions prevent recurrence. Capturing this information at rework creation time (rather than investigating after the fact) improves accuracy and reduces audit preparation time significantly.
How can manufacturing companies reduce repeat rework on the same component?
Repeat rework—where a component is reworked once, fails re-inspection, and requires rework a second time—is a leading indicator of process inadequacy or incorrect rework procedures. The best approach combines proper rework procedure design, technician verification, and escalation workflows. When initial rework fails re-inspection, the component should not immediately return to the same technician for a second rework attempt. Instead, the system should escalate to engineering: "Component SN-2024-0847 was reworked to correct dimensional defect (0.505" vs. 0.500"), but re-inspection shows it remains out of spec at 0.502". Engineering reviews the original rework procedure and determines why it failed: Was the procedure inadequate? Did the technician use incorrect equipment? Is the specification too tight for the available rework methods? Engineering then either (A) designs an improved rework procedure with more detailed steps or different technique, (B) escalates to product engineering to determine if the specification can be relaxed, or (C) recommends scrap if rework is not feasible. Most manufacturers reducing repeat rework implement monthly analysis of all repeat rework cases, looking for patterns: "Dimensional rework has 12% repeat rate, Assembly rework has 3%. What's different?" This analysis typically reveals inadequate procedures, operator skill gaps, or specification issues that should be resolved at the root. Companies reducing repeat rework from 8-10% to 2-3% simultaneously improve product quality and reduce rework costs by 10-15%.
How does rework order tracking integrate with existing manufacturing ERP systems?
A rework order tracker designed for manufacturing operations must integrate bidirectionally with ERP systems (SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, Infor) to maintain real-time component traceability. The integration works as follows: When a component is initially produced and marked complete in the ERP work order, the rework system receives the production context data—work order number, produced component serial numbers or batch ID, operator, equipment, setup, material lot, production date/shift. If that component is later identified as defective, a rework order is created in the rework system and linked to the original ERP work order. When rework is complete and re-inspection passes, the rework system updates the ERP inventory record: the component status changes from "Produced" to "Reworked—Released" with metadata showing rework order number, rework reason, and completion date. This linkage enables comprehensive traceability queries: "Show all components on PO-12345 to Customer ABC that contained reworked components." For manufacturing facilities with multiple production lines or shifts, this integration prevents components from being released twice (once as "Produced," again as "Reworked") and eliminates inventory confusion. Integration is typically accomplished via REST API calls or scheduled batch file imports, syncing ERP work order data nightly to the rework tracker and syncing completed rework orders back to ERP for inventory updates. Most implementations take 2-4 weeks and require basic API mapping work, not custom development.

Deployment Model

Rapid Implementation

2-4 week implementation with our proven tech stack. Get up and running quickly with minimal disruption.

Your Infrastructure

Deploy on your servers with Docker containers. You own all your data with perpetual license - no vendor lock-in.

Related Solutions

🚫

Non-Conformance Report (NCR) System

Defect spotted. Photo snapped. Barcode scanned. NCR filed—all before the part leaves the station.
📊

Quality Control Dashboard

First-pass yield dropped 3% last shift. You see it now, not next week. Fix it before it compounds.
✅

First Article Inspection (FAI) Tracker

Aerospace customer asks for AS9102 forms. You generate them in minutes—balloon drawings, dimensions, sign-offs, all digital.

Ready to Get Started?

Let's discuss how Rework Order Tracker can transform your operations.

Schedule a Demo